Complementary Protection and Integration: Why “Integration or ReImmigration” Is Not “Remigration”

Welcome to a new episode of the podcast “Integration or ReImmigration”.
My name is Attorney Fabio Loscerbo.

Across Europe, the immigration debate is becoming more polarized every year.

On one side, there is the idea of unlimited multiculturalism — the belief that immigration should continue without any real obligation of integration into the host society.

On the other side, there is the growing concept of “remigration”, which proposes the large-scale return of migrants to their countries of origin regardless of their individual level of integration.

But the paradigm “Integration or ReImmigration” is something very different from both of these approaches.

It is not about open borders.
And it is not about indiscriminate mass deportations either.

The central idea is that the right to remain in a country should depend on concrete integration.

This is where the Italian legal concept of “complementary protection” becomes extremely important.

Recent decisions issued by the Tribunals of Bologna and Venice in 2026 show that Italian judges continue to protect migrants who have developed real social and economic ties with Italy, even after restrictive immigration reforms adopted in 2023.

The courts are increasingly focusing on specific elements: stable employment, knowledge of the Italian language, housing stability, social participation, volunteer work, respect for public order, and real integration into the national community.

In other words, Italian immigration law is gradually shifting from a debate about entry to a debate about permanence.

The real question is no longer only: who can enter the country?

The new question is: according to which criteria can someone remain permanently inside the country?

The paradigm “Integration or ReImmigration” tries to answer this question through legal and measurable standards rather than ideological slogans.

A migrant who works, integrates, respects the law, participates in society, and builds stable ties with the community should be able to develop a lawful path of permanence.

At the same time, the model rejects the idea that permanent residence should be automatic regardless of behavior or integration.

This is also why “Integration or ReImmigration” is fundamentally different from “remigration”.

Remigration usually operates through collective logic.
“Integration or ReImmigration” operates through individual legal evaluation.

And today, complementary protection is becoming one of the most important legal laboratories for this debate in Europe.

Because the future immigration debate will probably not focus only on borders anymore.

It will increasingly focus on the meaning of integration itself.

My name is Attorney Fabio Loscerbo and this was a new episode of the podcast “Integration or ReImmigration”.

• Stellt Europa die falsche Frage zur Migration?
• LIVE – L’immigrazione non può essere misurata soltanto in base al lavoro
• Sicurezza e immigrazione: il dibattito dimentica che anche l’integrazione è una politica di sicurezza
• ¿Puede el Derecho español inspirarse en el modelo italiano?
• La regolarizzazione di massa della Spagna può violare il diritto dell’Unione? È tempo di valutare una procedura d’infrazion