Over the past few days, I’ve reflected on two key aspects of Italy’s immigration policy that actually have a broader and more universal significance: the Integration Agreement and the proposal to establish an Immigration Police.
These aren’t just Italian issues — they concern every nation that wants to approach immigration with balance, responsibility, and a long-term vision.
As I’ve explained in several articles, the Integration Agreement shouldn’t be treated as a mere bureaucratic formality. It represents the moral and legal foundation of the relationship between a foreign national and the State that hosts them.
Signing that agreement means choosing to become part of a political community — accepting its values, its culture, and its rules.
In Italy, this agreement requires concrete commitments: learning the language, understanding the Constitution, obeying the laws, and contributing — as far as one’s abilities allow — to the economic and social life of the country.
Integration is not an automatic right; it’s a process. And like any process, it requires effort, consistency, and verification.
When that process fails — through personal choice, indifference, or refusal to respect the rules — ReImmigration must take place: returning to one’s country of origin. Because remaining in a host country only makes sense when there’s a genuine willingness to participate in its civic life and to respect its fundamental laws.
But integration can’t rely solely on individual behavior. The State also needs a clear, coordinated structure to manage immigration in a unified and transparent way.
That’s why I’ve proposed creating an Immigration Police, a specialized force that brings together functions currently scattered among different offices.
In Italy, the Immigration Divisions within police headquarters handle key administrative duties, but they lack an operational structure with a comprehensive vision — one capable of coordinating reception, enforcement, deportation, and international cooperation.
In the United States, ICE — Immigration and Customs Enforcement — already fulfills that role. Italy, and Europe as a whole, should follow a similar path — not to close borders, but to manage them responsibly.
Because a country that doesn’t know who enters, who stays, and who leaves isn’t a welcoming country — it’s a disorganized one.
Integration and security are not opposing goals. They are two sides of the same coin — both necessary to build a just and stable society.
Italy could serve as a European testing ground: a nation where the balance between hospitality and order, between rights and responsibilities, is actively pursued.
That balance should guide the entire European Union — toward shared standards, effective monitoring, and genuine cooperation.
Immigration is not a crisis to endure; it’s a reality to govern — with the right tools and with shared values.
In the end, integration cannot exist without legality, and legality means nothing without a real project of integration.
That’s the essence of the paradigm I propose: Integration or ReImmigration.
It’s not an ideological slogan — it’s a principle of realism and accountability.
The future of Europe will depend on our ability to welcome those who want to belong — and to return those who refuse to.
Italy can lead the way, offering a model that combines humanity with firmness, solidarity with responsibility.
I’m attorney Fabio Loscerbo, and I invite you to read more insights at http://www.reimmigrazione.com.
Lascia un commento