🎙️ Title: Integration as Responsibility – From the 2025 Justice Forum to the ReImmigration Paradigm

🎙️ Title: Integration as Responsibility – From the 2025 Justice Forum to the ReImmigration Paradigm

On October 27, 2025, during the Justice Forum, the legal tabloid Giustizia — distributed with Italy’s national newspaper Corriere della Sera — published an article dedicated to my work and to the paradigm “Integration or ReImmigration.”

The Justice Forum is one of the most important events in the Italian legal landscape.
It is an annual gathering that brings together judges, lawyers, institutional representatives, universities, and law enforcement agencies to discuss key issues concerning justice, rights, and institutional reform.
It is a space for dialogue where the legal world meets civil society and journalism, reflecting on the challenges of the present and the directions for the future.

In this context, the publication of my contribution represents an important recognition of a cultural and legal journey that I have been pursuing for years: a new vision of migration based on mutual responsibility.

In the model I propose, integration is not an abstract concept or an act of mere tolerance.
It is a verifiable obligation, built on three essential pillars: work, language, and respect for the law.
Only through these elements can we truly speak of belonging, inclusion, and social balance.

The “Integration or ReImmigration” paradigm was born from daily experience in Italian courts, police headquarters, and prefectures — places where the distance between rules and reality is constantly tested.
Its goal is to restore coherence and responsibility to immigration law, moving beyond the emergency-based logic and ideological divisions that have long dominated public debate.

Integration means taking responsibility: learning the language of the host country, contributing to its economic system, and respecting its rules.
ReImmigration, on the other hand, is not a punishment but a natural consequence for those who do not adhere to this social pact.
It reflects the idea that the State should facilitate the return of those who cannot or will not integrate — always guaranteeing personal dignity, but also protecting the collective interest.

The Justice Forum 2025 was an opportunity to bring the issue of migration back into the national debate on justice and public policy.
The article published in Giustizia, distributed with the Corriere della Sera, confirms that the paradigm “Integration or ReImmigration” is no longer just a theoretical concept but a point of reference for those who believe in a fair balance between hospitality, rights, and responsibility.

The future of migration policies will depend on our ability to make integration a real, measurable, and shared process.
Only then can we build a society capable of welcoming others without losing its own identity.

I am Avvocato Fabio Loscerbo, and this is Integration or ReImmigration.

Integration or ReImmigration as a Coherent Legal System – Integration or ReImmigration: The Podcast

Integration or ReImmigration as a Coherent Legal System Welcome to a new episode of the podcast Integration or ReImmigration.I am Attorney Fabio Loscerbo. Throughout this series, we have analyzed immigration step by step: entry, lawful presence, integration, protection, enforcement, and return. What emerges is a simple but often ignored truth: integration and ReImmigration are not opposing policies. They are two possible outcomes of the same legal process. The mistake of contemporary debate is to treat integration as inherently good and return as inherently hostile. Law does not operate through moral oppositions. It operates through conditions and consequences. A functioning legal system does not choose between integration and return; it defines when each applies. Integration, in this framework, is a conditional process. It presupposes lawful entry, compliance with obligations, and compatibility with the legal order. When these conditions are met, stabilization becomes legitimate. ReImmigration, by contrast, is the lawful conclusion of that same process when those conditions are not met. What gives coherence to the system is conditionality. Entry opens a legal relationship. Lawful presence unfolds over time. Conduct is evaluated. Protection prevents unlawful removal. Decisions are enforced. Each phase follows logically from the previous one. Remove one element, and the system loses balance. This approach resolves the false conflict between rights and sovereignty. Fundamental rights remain protected, but permanence is never automatic. Sovereignty is exercised through law, not through exclusion or improvisation. A coherent system also creates predictability. Individuals know what is required. Authorities know when to act. Courts operate within clear parameters. Predictability reduces conflict and restores trust in institutions. By contrast, incoherent systems produce symbolic integration, unlimited protection, and traumatic enforcement. Integration becomes rhetoric, and return becomes a crisis event. No one benefits from this instability. Integration or ReImmigration offers a different model. It does not promise universal integration, nor does it advocate mass return. It promises governability. It treats immigration as a legal process with possible outcomes, not as an ideological battlefield. In the final episode, we will look beyond Europe. We will examine whether this paradigm can be applied to the United States and other Western democracies, and what institutional adjustments would be required. Thank you for listening.Questo episodio include contenuti generati dall’IA.

1. Integration or ReImmigration as a Coherent Legal System 04:43
2. Integration or ReImmigration as a Coherent Legal System 04:43
3. State Capacity, Control, and the Survival of the Legal Order 04:22
4. The Albania Case: Execution, Not Deterrence 04:53
5. Instruments, Enforcement, and Immigration Policing: Without Execution, Law Dies 04:58